This guest post is from one of my wonderful sons. I mentioned to him that the BMA's latest proclamations that smoking should be banned in cars, that minimum alcohol pricing will eradicate alcoholism and that the banning of certain fats in foods would turn us all into perfect physical specimens were to be the themes in upcoming posts. He told me that he had responded in the comments section of The Telegraph to the thoughts of an anti-smoking zealot whose foaming mouth was in danger of choking him. Below is a slightly amended version of same. Michael will respond as and when possible to any observations you may have on his post.
Ever since reading about the proposed outdoor smoking ban near the fresh air zone that is car-gridlocked Milton Keynes, I have been very disturbed by the
rabid psychosis of today's anti-smokers as seen on online newspapers' readers' comments.
Let me make one thing clear - non-smokers and anti-smokers are two different beasts. My friends, virtually all of whom are non-smokers, are tolerant, friendly and interested in other people. They realise we live in a polluted world and make the best of it. They see me first, not the ciggie in my mouth.
The anti-smoker however is intolerant of anyone else's joy which s/he does not understand. The anti-smoker seems to believe that the bubble of the atmosphere within 5 metres of their nose is actually their property and not a shared space. The anti-smoker sees the ciggie in my mouth first and does not believe that a human being worthy of respect is attached to it.
On the Telegraph website, a poster named "Cyphre" was advocating physical violence against smokers. Of course, this is just his mouth shooting off on the internet - it is doubtful he would ever do such a thing in the real world. It makes me wonder what part of his psyche and his need to be heard makes him preach that which he would be too scared to practice?
He then states "The air is naturally clean of harmful tobacco smoke so anyone smoking is knowingly polluting the air."
All human activity pollutes the air.
The fumes coming from a smoke-free pub's kitchen are full of all types of nasty carcinogens that are inhaled by all the unsuspecting victims of the murderous landlord. According to the Global Alliance for Clean Cookstoves,
cooking smoke is estimated to shorten the lives of 1.9 million people a year.
It's worse than that though.
Cleaning solvents contains such lethal dangers as
naptha, which cause dangers to the eyes, skin, liver, kidney and more. When the oven is on, the cooking process releases those into the atmosphere as well.
The
air fresheners the landlord's cleaner uses contain
carcinogens,
volatile organic compounds and known toxins such as
phthalate esters in their formulas. In 2008, Anne Steinemann of the University of Washington published a study of top-selling air fresheners and laundry products. She found that
all products tested gave off chemicals regulated as toxic or hazardous under federal laws, including carcinogens with no safe exposure level, but none of these chemicals were listed on any of the product labels or Material Safety Data Sheets. Chemicals included
acetone, the active ingredient in paint thinner and nail-polish remover;
chloromethane, a neurotoxicant and respiratory toxicant; and
acetaldehyde and
1,4-dioxane, both carcinogens.
To prepare the meat you'll be eating at your smokefree pub, a whole global industry is involved in cutting down trees and replacing them with plains. Whilst I personally believe that the AGM case is wildly overstated (just like passive smoking), livestock release countless thousands of tonnes of stinky, smelly farts into the atmosphere. This may be matched by other
pollutant gasses involved in their rearing, slaughtering, butchery and distribution.
On the subject of farting, you might gently and discretely lift a buttock cheek to squeeze out a fart out in your smoke-free pub. However, because you can't see it doesn't mean the mortal dangers aren't there, you selfish murderer. The primary constituents of flatulence are the
non-odorous gases nitrogen (ingested),
carbon dioxide (produced by aerobic microbes or ingested), and
hydrogen (produced by some microbes and consumed by others), as well as lesser amounts of
oxygen (ingested) and
methane (produced by anaerobic microbes). Odors result from trace amounts of other components (often
sulphur containing). The gas released during a flatus event frequently has a foul odour which mainly results from low molecular weight fatty acids such as
butyric acid (rancid butter smell) and reduced sulfur compounds such as
hydrogen sulfide (rotten egg smell) and
carbonyl sulfide that are the result of protein breakdown.
Your demand to be able to sit in your smoke-free pub at anytime explains the existence of the on-demand electricity and gas industries. By their very nature, they have to release countless tons of
pollutants into the air to suit your desire to sit down and have your steak and chips.
Of course, you and the other patrons have had to
pollute the air by travelling to your smoke-free pub of choice. This probably involved a vehicle using internal combustion, whether a taxi, bus or car. This can be hardly considered essential transport - you are making it for selfish reasons.
Traffic pollution "contributes to thousands of deaths a year caused by pneumonia, research suggested yesterday." The researcher, Professor George Knox said the annual death toll caused by air pollution was comparable to that caused by the London smog of 1952, which
killed 4,000 people.
Cyphre should stop flapping your gums and talking such lunacy. Everything anyone does affects someone else - the question is to what degree.
Passive smoking studies are flimsy and nonsensical. The latest gem suggests that passive smoke are more dangerous than traffic fumes.
It's a wonder why so many people committing suicide chose traffic fumes through a hose rather than just having a ciggy in a car.
I gave up smoking after 18 years. I smoked the grand total of 160,000 cigarettes in that time - at least. If I can survive that, you can survive a brief whiff of cigarette smoke.
Otherwise, I'll expect to see you on the streets demanding the immediate banning of farting, air fresheners, commercial kitchens, the internal combustion engine, meat consumption and power generation. The reason? I can denormalise you and stigmatise you because the flawed studies of biased interest groups say I can.
Michael Entferrier (Guest Poster)
It 
