Dr Rant
I’ve just tried to change my password to ‘Community Mental Health Team’ but Facebook said: contains too many useless characters. (Facebook 16/12/11)
Sorry Community Mental Health Teams (CMHTs) – I find this to be true – well certainly in my neck of the woods. God help the unfortunate soul who experiences an exacerbation of mental health ‘ishoos’ while residing in social care for they are truly lost!
I have written about this before and unfortunately nothing has changed. The CMHT completely ignore us (staff) in that they do not seek our input, our knowledge and our concerns. Liaison – what’s that? Do they consult the referring GP (?) – I tend to think not (and indeed sometimes know) as GPs are equally frustrated re the lack of communication and cooperation between ‘colleagues’ and that (wrong) decisions are made (by the CMHT) after a thirty minute interview with the poor resident in question.
Ted entered our home some five years ago – he does not have any problems related to memory but that of depression and apathy which has dogged him since a traumatic incident in early adulthood. He is isolated due to social anxiety which increases his depression and feelings of hopelessness and low self-worth.
This has been his life for nigh on thirty years and increasing apathy, hopelessness led to Ted being at high risk of self-neglect and increasingly vulnerable to those in society who ‘befriend’ him and rob him of his benefits and thus him becoming a welcome resident of our home. Our home is now his home. (It is Ted's home - I/we have the privilege of working there!)
This has been his life for nigh on thirty years and increasing apathy, hopelessness led to Ted being at high risk of self-neglect and increasingly vulnerable to those in society who ‘befriend’ him and rob him of his benefits and thus him becoming a welcome resident of our home. Our home is now his home. (It is Ted's home - I/we have the privilege of working there!)
For some time Ted has become reflective re his personal situation and this in itself has led to a deeper depression (‘I am worthless’) and as he is comfortable in his home he is also able to express anger (‘I am useless!’) both verbally and physically (as in punching inanimate objects and destroying his own personal effects).
Ted has – for the first time – begun to self-harm. He also exhibits behaviours that some might construe as sexual in nature – but to me (and I have discussed this with him) are an expression of his need to be loved and reverting to babyhood and the intervention required is to him, proof of caring.
Ted’s GP referred him to psychiatric services requesting the input of a psychiatrist. In turn, said psychiatrist did not see Ted rather placing Ted’s future in the hands of the CMHT. What is the purpose of the CMHT? A CMHT meets the needs of people with mental health problems who don’t need a psychiatrist.
So it needs to be asked: Does this little collusion of anonymity (psychiatrist and CMHT) have an agenda? Why is the GP referral of secondary importance to that of the CMHT – who make their decisions based on a thirty minute interview without liaising with other interested professionals who know Ted?
The CMHT in their wisdom decided that Ted did not need to see a psychiatrist. This decision – to Ted – was further evidence of his unimportance (‘Why is no-one interested in me?’).
Ted’s continued and deepening depression began to compromise his physical health in that he ceased to eat and had poor fluid intake causing an electrolyte imbalance which led to problems and the need for medication to counteract this.
Ted’s GP, who had long realised that Ted’s needs were beyond his expertise again contacted psychiatric services, pressing for the input of a psychiatrist and again this led to a swoop by the CMHT, who again decided that Ted did not need to be seen by a psychiatrist?
Six months ago, near death (malnutrition and dehydration), Ted was hospitalised. He was at this time (finally) seen by a psychiatrist and when strong enough was transferred to a psychiatric hospital to treat his depression!
The psychiatrist contacted the home for a history of Ted and requested our thoughts – something the CMHT (and indeed the psychiatrist prior to this) did not!
It appears to me that the little collusion of anonymity ensured Ted paid a high cost both physically and mentally by denying him access to a psychiatrist – but that is what collusion of anonymity is all about – bouncing patients back and forth from one specialist/discipline to another with nobody taking responsibility for the patient as a person.
Ted is a person.
Before I close I would like to assure those who exist in CMHTs that this is a specific post to experiences in my neck of the woods and is not a gross generalisation of all. I am sure that team members offer a vital hand to those in the community who do not need to see a psychiatrist.
Why do psychiatrists not take heed of GPs here? Why in these instances are decisions left to CMHTs as to whether a patient requires the input of a psychiatrist – why does the psychiatrist not see the patient and make the decision him or herself? Just wondering, that’s all…
What say you?
Anna :o]